September 04, 2009
Read Jonathan Leaf's "The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to The
Sixties" and Dr. Miriam Grossman's "You're Teaching My Child What?"
Together they are two sides of the same coin. Leaf exposes the weedy
myths of the '60s, and Grossman slams Al Kinsey's sex lies for
creating modern "sex education."
My forthcoming WND book, (my third on Kinsey) details the link
between Kinsey's lies about our ancestors and our current erototoxic
Radicals who stayed in grad schools to evade soldiering eventually
"took over the faculty," reports Leaf. In time, Ph.D. draft dodgers
became university administrators. Naturally, such ideologues
practiced "Conservative Cleansing" to bring students in line with
their own pansexual dogma. "Recruit red" became the new pedagogy.
"A Case Study: 1981" During a two-year assignment as a research
professor at American University in Washington, D.C., I witnessed the
Education dean's "Conservative Cleansing" program. New faculty hires
would be restricted to "true liberals."
Psychiatrist and former university doctor Miriam Grossman reports on
the "sex education" forced on American youth by decades of pansexual
PC pedagogues. In the interest of full disclosure, Grossman drew
significantly from my findings on Alfred Kinsey, et al.
I obviously agree with her: "Dr. Kinsey was to sex education what
Henry Ford was to the automobile … the master architect of a new
model of human sexuality."
Grossman adds that Kinsey "spawned a revolution and transformed
Western culture." In reviewing today's toxic sexual landscape, she
says modern sex education "derives from the personal philosophy of a
man enslaved to the urges of a warped mind."
DVD shows how "the father of the sexual revolution" has endangered
our children and our culture "The Kinsey Syndrome"
Indeed, she provides the Kinseyan sexology training missing from
Leaf's concise '60s overview. Kinsey is the cause of the "free sex"
lies percolating down from college, to high school, to grammar
school, and even to kindergarten.
Kinsey's lies of harmless free sex "in the 1940s and 1950s" were
taught by Planned Parenthood and the Sex Information and Education
Council of the U.S., "SIECUS in the 1960s" and thereafter.
My review of data from Drs. Phyllis and Eberhard Kronhausen fully
sustain the Leaf/Grossman histories. The Dutch couple surveyed 200
male college males for "Sex Histories of American College Men"
(1960). The Kronhausens were sexual freedom advocates and Kinsey
devotees. In 1960, they ridiculed the virginity of the majority of
American college men. They wrote:
"The average modern college man … considers intercourse 'too
precious' to have with anyone except the girl he expects to marry and
may actually abstain from all intercourse for that reason. …"
"Many of the students were as blushingly romantic about sex morals as
any girl of their age would be. To these young men, sex without love
seemed utterly unethical … this group engages in relatively little
premarital sexual intercourse. ..."
College men, even in the early '60s, felt "emancipated" that sex was
precious, was reserved for marriage. Premarital and oral sex were
frowned upon while anal sodomy was abhorrent the latter seen as
inharmonious, homosexual acts.
Kinsey claimed male college homosexuality was "about 20 percent." The
Kronhausens were shocked and distressed that only "one-half of 1
percent (one in 200 college men)" were allegedly homosexual.
Publicity releases for Grossman say she "rips back the curtain on sex
education today, exposing a sordid truth. Today's sex ed programs …
[are] based on liberal lies and politically correct propaganda that
promote the illusion that children (yes, children) can be sexually
free without risk."
Thank you Dr. Kinsey.
Pre-Kinsey traditional Judeo-Christian ideals of patriotism, home,
family and child asexuality were the backbone of our economic, health
and social successes. Leaf notes the '60s as dominated by
conservative fashions and "Broadway musicals not bell bottoms and
Bob Dylan. … [R]adical factions hijacked feminism, the civil rights
movement and academia."
Student anti-Vietnam activists were a college minority. Family media,
television, magazines and film typified the era.
Joe College would be slowly remolded to jettison love and marriage
for "free" love. This naturally triggered a women's backlash that
became a movement post-1964. Too soon it was hijacked by deluded divas.
It is rewarding to read Grossman fully validating my decades of
research as she says, "Scratch the surface of SIECUS, Planned
Parenthood and other groups, and you'll discover that they are
essentially mouthpieces for [Kinsey's] views. In the upside-down
world of sex education, the ideology of Alfred Kinsey has been enshrined."
Since her coverage is necessarily brief, Grossman misses the covert
gutting of our sex laws by the Kinseyfied American Law Institute's
1955 Model Penal Code. Legal change permitted Kinseyfied sex-ed "womb
to tomb" propaganda to spawn today's epidemic sexual diseases among
young and old alike, some incurable and some fatal.
Grossman gives scholarly kudos to two doctors who had testified to
sex education dangers despite the "attacks" and "backlash" against
their critical findings. Being familiar with such attacks, I value
Grossman's ethical, well-deserved recognition of others.
Remember, George Orwell warned that social control is based on
erasing the public memory of its past! PC teaching erases our history
and creates scientific and medical lies to suborn a Kinseyan
pansexual "Brave New World."
Dr. Judith Reisman is former principal investigator for the U.S.
Department of Justice, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
study of child sexual abuse and crimes suborned by "soft"
pornography, and author of several books on Kinsey and pornography,
including "Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences." More is available at
Reisman's website. http://drjudithreisman.com/