Monday, January 31, 2011

Article "Frigid New York and The Beggars Group Present YIPPIE 2011/01/27"

Frigid New York and The Beggars Group Present YIPPIE 2011/01/27

FRIGID NEW YORK PRESENTS The Beggars Group PRODUCTION OF YIPPIE!

Written & Directed by RAndy Anderson & Harrison Williams

Wednesday February 23 @ 9pm

Friday February 25 @ 8:30pm

Sunday February 27 @ 1pm

Thursday March 3 @ 9pm

Saturday March 5 @ 7pm

At

The Kraine Theater - 85 East 4th Street, New York NY 10003

Tickets are $16 and available by calling
Smarttix at 212-868-4444 or online at www.FRIGIDnewyork.info

YIPPIE! is an explosive look back on the events that defined the Youth
International Party. 1967 meets 2011 in this time twisting exploration
of freedom, fun, and fanatics.

Based on The Beggars Group's 2001 hit production Do It!, YIPPIE!
explores the politics of protest through a stylized and highly physical
collection of scenarios from the Yippie movement. Founded in 1967, the
Yippies turned political angst and protest into theater through such
stunts as dropping dollar bills on the Stock Exchange and levitating the
Pentagon. Things turn violent in the summer of 1968 during the
Democratic National Convention in Chicago where "sit ins" are replaced
by Molotov Cocktails. YIPPIE! asks the question: What are you willing to
sacrifice for the revolution?

--
http://offoffbroadway.broadwayworld.com/article/Frigid_New_York_and_The_Beggars_Group_Present_YIPPIE_20110127
Via InstaFetch

Article "The State Hornet - Survey shows limited free speech at CSUS"

Survey shows limited free speech at CSUS

A recent survey found Sacramento State to be among the most restrictive
four-year universities in the nation in terms of limiting the free
speech of students.

In the report "Spotlight on Speech Codes 2011," conducted by a national
free speech advocacy organization, Sac State was ranked along with 236
other colleges considered major public universities, the top 100
national universities and top 50 liberal arts colleges, according to the
U.S. News and World Report.

In its ranking, each school was assigned either a green, yellow or red
light based on the extent in which its administrators limited free
speech on campus.

Sac State received the red-light ranking along with Chico State, UC
Santa Cruz and UC Davis, while other California universities such as UC
Santa Barbara and UC Berkeley received a yellow light.

Kimo Ah Yun, the new department chair of communication studies, was
surprised by the study and said he did not see the campus as a place
where he has seen substantial limitations on free speech.

Sac State confines demonstrations of free speech to the area in front of
the University Library, according to Sac State policies.

Ah Yun said he thinks free speech is vital because it gives people the
right to express opinions without concern for retribution, and he
believes Sac State is a place where everyone can openly share ideas.

"It is important to expose students to variety of ideas, especially
counter-culture ideas," Ah Yun said. "It becomes a place where students
and faculty can take ideas they hear, and take them and discuss them in
the classroom."

A university can earn a red light by having a policy that clearly and
substantially limits freedom of speech or that bars public access to its
speech policies and the web.

A campus earns a yellow light if its policies could be interpreted in
some ways to compromise protected speech or restricting certain types of
free speech, with a green light meaning that its policies are very
welcoming to all forms of expression.

Ah Yun said he supports expansion of locations available for free speech
on campus, but does not think there is a problem with the space that
already exists.

"It draws a greater cross-section of students," Ah Yun said.

He said it would be more confining if instead of the library the space
was in a more closed-off part of campus, like if the administrators
limited student demonstrations in a less noticeable place such as in
front of the theatre.

Of 390 schools in the survey, 67 percent received a red light, 27
percent a yellow light, 3 percent obtained a green light, and the final
3 percent did not get a rating because they were private universities
that claimed to elevate certain values above a commitment to free speech
for students.

According to the survey, 64 percent of the 33 California university
campuses received a red light.

Sac State alumnus Jennon Valentine-Martinez said he did not realize how
limiting the university was on this issue.

"We have First Amendment rights, as long as it's not violating federal
law I don't see it as a problem," Ah Yun said.

While there is the designated spot for expression of opinion in front of
the library, the fact that other schools in the state have more freedom
was telling to Valentine-Martinez.

"Anyone can give their opinion, and if they want they should be able to
do so wherever," Ah Yun said.

Freshman engineering major Kayla Beal said she is unsure about the
extent of free speech on campus. She said it depends on what it is
about.

"Some people could offend other people," Beal said.

Also critical, is not just where protesting is conducted, but exactly
how it is expressed.

Ah Yun said that while free speech is valuable it does have its limits.

"If there is a physical effect from something violent that is said, then
absolutely there should be restrictions," Ah Yun said.

Valentine-Martinez said there should not be a limit on what students can
and cannot say as long as it is not threatening in nature.

"You can't just say ‘I'm going to blow up the university,'"
Valentine-Martinez said.

Beal said she is for expanding areas that would allow free speech.

"It is important that everyone should get an opportunity," Beal said.

For many students, the issue comes down to how freedom of speech is
conducted.

"It's being able to express yourself in a way that's not threatening or
harassing, but allowing criticism to occur in a responsible dialogue,"
Valentine-Martinez said.

Sean Keister can be reached at skeister@statehornet.com

--
http://www.statehornet.com/news/survey-shows-limited-free-speech-at-csus-1.1916735
Via InstaFetch

Article "Hastings on nonviolence: Feel a draft=?UTF-8?B?PyI=?=

Hastings on nonviolence: Feel a draft?

It was 38 years ago today that the draft ended and it hasn't come back,
but its shadow looms across the American bad memory landscape, only
dying out as my generation passes on and the baby boomers lose their
boom. Why did it end, why did it start, and why isn't it back, since we
are in a couple of wars now with more threatening?

The draft ended because civil society had grown to despise it. When the
citizenry finally comes to despise something, elected officials
eventually get it and act, often because enough of the unresponsive ones
are defeated in elections. The rest begin to understand that a shift in
public attitude makes it adaptive for them to shift too. The US history
of the draft--and the resistance to it--is complicated and shocking in
some cases.

The draft during the Civil War was a lightning rod issue for both class
and race and the parties were not what we might assume from our notions
of what parties stand for today in the minds of many.

Democrats were "antiwar," but like so many who call themselves antiwar,
they were anti this war, not pacifists at all. Indeed, in the early
1860s they often referred to the war of secession as the "
nigger war
." They stoked the fears of poor whites, warning that if Lincoln, that
meddlesome Republican, managed to free the slaves, the north would be
flooded with free blacks who would take all the factory jobs and all the
unskilled or low-skilled work, replacing the immigrants from Ireland and
elsewhere. When Lincoln pushed through a stronger draft law, poor whites
rioted in New York City in what were really race riots but which are
known as draft riots. Eleven black men were lynched during the five days
of rioting, starting on the Monday morning, 13 July 1863, after the
draft lottery began.

Huge crowds of white men beat blacks, white owners of businesses that
served the black community, abolitionists, black women and they even
burned the black orphanage, though they did permit the 233 children to
escape. Fear of job loss fanned by inflammatory rhetoric and the most
uncivil public dialog produced a chapter so ugly in the history of New
York and America that it is not a big feature in most school history
texts. It should be.

America had accepted the draft after Pearl Harbor, even though the
threats from Nazi Germany had allowed Congress to pass the
Selective Training and Service Act of 1940
, the first peacetime draft in US history.
Dave Dellinger
and some other nonviolent men from the Union Theological Seminary openly
resisted that, refused to register, and were sent to prison.

In a complete reversal of the racist draft riots of 1863, the World War
II pacifists who served prison time organized against segregation in the
prisons and succeeded in changing federal prison policy, achieving
desegregation in some prisons before it would be achieved 15-20 years
later in "free" society around those prisons in the South.

Draft resistance in Vietnam was sketchy at first and pandemic near the
end. January 27 is a satisfying date to recall that end to involuntary
servitude. The resistance to that draft in that war was
complex
and ranged from the stupidest (which, as a boy of 17 in 1968, I almost
did, until I finally came in contact with the draft resistance
movement), which was to enlist in one branch of the armed forces in
order to avoid going to Vietnam, to the most principled, which was to
publicly burn one's draft card and head off to prison. There were many
shades of response, from the Bill Clinton model (stay in school long
enough to remain exempt from the fighting) to the Ben Spock/Dave
Dellinger model (even if you are not of draft age, you commit nonviolent
civil resistance to it and risk imprisonment) and everything in between.

By the time it finally ended, US civil society opposed it and the
generals and politicians learned to avoid it at all costs. They are the
new draft resisters, using other methods to conscript nowadays. They
love it when the economy tanks and young people are desperate for GI
benefits, a job, and even housing. It's the Darth Vader approach: Luke,
come over to the dark side. Young people, boxed in, see one way out as
the recruiters shine bright lights on their option. It's not called a
draft now, but it is a defacto poverty draft and I look forward to the
day that ends. I hope we can all join in working to create other
attractive options for our youth or we will continue our slide toward a
militarized culture. Meanwhile, a moment to honor the end of the draft
on this day in 1973. May it never come again.
References
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/317749.html

--
http://hastingsnonviolence.blogspot.com/2011/01/feel-draft.html
Via InstaFetch

Article "the_black_power_mixtape_danny_glover"

"The Black Power Mixtape" - Danny Glover Discusses New Doc Featuring
Rare Archival Footage of Angela Davis, Huey P. Newton, Stokely
Carmichael

AMY GOODMAN: K’naan, singing "Wavin’ Flag." He was singing in our
studios in New York, but he was also singing here this weekend in Park
City, Utah, at the Sundance Film Festival. This is Democracy Now!,
democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman. And that’s
where we’re broadcasting from today—yes, Park City, Utah, home of the
Sundance Film Festival, the nation’s largest festival for independent
cinema. We’re at Sundance this week to feature independent voices from
here in the United States and around the world. More than 200 films and
documentaries are being screened and premiered here at Sundance.

One of this year’s selection that’s creating a lot of buzz is a
documentary called The Black Power Mixtape. The film features rare
archival footage shot between 1967 and 1975, including some of the
leading figures of the Black Power movement in the United States, like
Stokely Carmichael, Bobby Seale, Huey P. Newton, Angela Davis, Eldridge
Cleaver. The footage was shot by two Swedish journalists and was
discovered in the basement of Swedish public television 30 years later.

Well, the renowned actor and activist Danny Glover co-produced The Black
Power Mixtape. We flew in on Friday night. It was the first film we saw.
Yesterday I had a chance to sit down with Danny Glover to talk about the
film.

AMY GOODMAN: Welcome to Democracy Now!, Danny Glover.

DANNY GLOVER: Thank you very much, Amy. Thank you.

AMY GOODMAN: So, Danny, tell us about this film.

DANNY GLOVER: Well, certainly it’s extraordinary. It’s almost, when you
think about something like—let’s face it—that we’re dealing with now in
terms of WikiLeaks, you know, and how information is uncovered. This
film is about information or documentary—documentary filmmakers and
interviews with members of—people who were involved in the Black Power
movement.

AMY GOODMAN: Now, this was found in the basement?

DANNY GLOVER: It’s found in the basement—the basement—of Swedish
Television. It had been aired only once, as a series. And these
incredibly rich interviews—I mean, just from 1967 to 1975.

AMY GOODMAN: Seventy-five.

DANNY GLOVER: Rich interviews of men and women who were involved in the
Black Power movement, but also Swedish Television coming to the United
States and assessing themselves and interviewing people about the
movement. So, you would have an interview, a young sister at the Black
Panther Party office in New York who talks about the revolution, you
know, or you would have a free breakfast for children program, or you
have all this rare footage of Bobby Seale’s in somewhere in Europe. So,
this is what this is about. So it’s a compilation of all these
interviews, all these documentary films that were done, all this rich
archival information about the Black Power movement.

AMY GOODMAN: Let’s play a clip of Stokely Carmichael.

STOKELY CARMICHAEL: Now, let us begin with the modern period of—I guess
we could start with 1956. For our generation, this was the beginning of
the rise of Dr. Martin Luther King. Dr. King decided that in Montgomery,
Alabama, black people had to pay the same prices on the buses as did
white people, but we had to sit in the back. And we could only sit in
the back if every available seat was taken by a white person. If a white
person was standing, a black person could not sit. So Dr. King and his
associates got together and said, "This is inhuman. We will boycott your
bus system."

Now, understand what a boycott is. A boycott is a passive act. It is the
most passive political act that anyone can commit, a boycott, because
what the boycott was doing was simply saying, "We will not ride your
buses." No sort of antagonism. It was not even verbally violent. It was
peaceful. Dr. King’s policy was that nonviolence would achieve the gains
for black people in the United States. His major assumption was that if
you are nonviolent, if you suffer, your opponent will see your suffering
and will be moved to change his heart. That’s very good. He only made
one fallacious assumption: in order for nonviolence to work, your
opponent must have a conscience. The United States has none, has none.

AMY GOODMAN: That was Stokely Carmichael—

DANNY GLOVER: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN:—in this film, The Black Power Mixtape, real rare footage of
Stokely Carmichael, who later came to be known as Kwame Ture, going to
Sweden—

DANNY GLOVER: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN:—and talking about, well, perhaps the differences between
him and Dr. King—

DANNY GLOVER: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN:—talking about the importance of action.

DANNY GLOVER: Yes, yeah. Well, one of the things that, I mean, as
you—it’s very interesting. As we’re talking about 1967, so much has
happened within the last four years, since the passage of the Voters
Rights Act—the riots in Watts, the riots in Detroit, the riots in
Newark. And here’s Stokely Carmichael. It so happens that I first met
Stokely Carmichael in 1967, when I was a student at San Francisco State.
And San Francisco State was very unique in the sense that a number of
the members of SNCC, who now decided were going back to school, came to
San Francisco and resettled in San Francisco. So Stokely, Ralph
Featherston, H. Rap Brown were out at San Francisco State on a regular
basis. And so, to hear him talk about, really, what was in 1967 the
beginning of his own transition and his own movement from, certainly,
the nonviolence—we had had the split in SNCC by that time. There were—we
had the removal of white members of SNCC. And all those things were
happening at this particular time.

And he began to announce his new path, certainly respectful of King—and
I say respectful of King, very respectful of King, as they all were. You
know, remember, it was King and Harry Belafonte who initiated the
Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, put up the resources for the
Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and, not only that, gave it
life. So here he is. Here’s the prodigal son breaking away at this
particular moment. And certainly, King had been to Sweden. King had
traveled to Scandinavian countries to raise money for the movement,
which is something that Harry prompted him to do, as well—Harry
Belafonte prompted him to do.

AMY GOODMAN: And, you know, of course, Dr. King had won the Nobel Peace
Prize in 1964, but the footage in Black Power Mixtape of Dr. King, the
king of Sweden raising money for him, and Harry Belafonte in Sweden
together.

DANNY GLOVER: Yes, yes. It’s quite remarkable, because it was Harry’s
suggestion that they go to Sweden to raise money. Harry, certainly when
he first met King in—I believe it was 1956, 1957—Harry, one of the most
popular artists in the world at the particular time, was going to use
his influence at the service—in the service of Dr. King, and so—and
certainly had very strong connections with Sweden and other Scandinavian
countries, as well. So, you hear—this is an incredible moment, you know,
and this is something that people don’t know about often, you know?

AMY GOODMAN: And now you, at this time, as you said, San Francisco
State—people have heard a lot about Columbia and the student strikes,
but the first big shutdown of a university is your own, and you were one
of the leaders of it.

DANNY GLOVER: Well, yes, San Francisco State, 1968. And part of this
was—we were all moving in some sort of way. The BSU, when I can to San
Francisco State in 1966, it was beginning to make its own transition,
you know. And why this film was important for me was the fact that it is
also my moment, my transition, as well. I had been raised—had been born
and raised through the civil rights movement, and now, as the Black
Power movement emerged, we begin to assume that—in fact, we had invited
Amiri Baraka out to San Francisco State in the spring of 1967. So, San
Francisco State—

AMY GOODMAN: The poet, activist from New Jersey.

DANNY GLOVER: The poet, activist. And we started becoming the Black Art
movement, as well. So here we have the Black Power movement, as we
identified by Stokely and the Black Panther Party, etc., and you had
students who were involved, as well, myself and others. And the strike
came out of that. The strike was an aggressive move by the Black Student
Union. And we were fortunate to get allies in terms of the Asian Student
Association and the Hispanic Student Association and also progressive
white students, that made it successful.

AMY GOODMAN: You were fighting for Black Studies at San Francisco State.
Just recently in Tucson, right at the same time of the horrendous
shooting, actually, a headline in the paper that day about how they were
shutting down ethnic studies.

DANNY GLOVER: They were shutting down the study, yeah. Well—

AMY GOODMAN: But you guys really started the activism for it.

DANNY GLOVER: We’re still—it’s 41 years old, the ethnic studies program.
And what was unique, it’s the first ethnic studies program and the only
one in any major university in the country. But interesting enough, the
first time that I saw Huey P. Newton and had any idea who the Black
Panther Party was in 1966, when he came to the Black House and was
reading poetry at the Black House. Huey P. Newton—that’s some footage we
should have had—reading poetry at the Black House. And at the Black
House, Ed Bullins lived. Eldridge Cleaver lived at the Black House. They
were two people who lived at the Black House. So, there was—you could
see this, and now we’re looking—certainly looking back in retrospect,
but you could see this emerging movement happening around, really, what
I believe was extraordinary moments of, as I said before, redefining and
reimagining democracy, organizing, using those skills. Stokely was an
organizer. Those members of SNCC were organizing. So, the Black Power
movement was about extending that whole sense of organizing and
community organizing.

AMY GOODMAN: So, Danny Glover, is President Obama—or was—a community
organizer in the South Side of Chicago. But he’s taken a very different
path?

DANNY GLOVER: Well, he made choices, certainly. And certainly, you know,
I come out of community service and community development, as well. I
worked for the Model Cities Program in the Office of Community
Development in San Francisco.

AMY GOODMAN: You were a social worker?

DANNY GLOVER: I was evaluations specialist and program manager in the
Model Cities Program from 1972 to 1978, and so—through 1977, rather. And
certainly, if you were able to—and this was a very key moment, because
this also—as I think about it right now, it also is along the same
lines, that parallels what’s happening in the film, that there was an
extraordinary level of grassroots democracy happening in communities
like the Mission District in San Francisco and the Bayview-Hunters Point
district in San Francisco. It is extraordinary. And certainly, it was
fueled, of course, by, I think, this sense of organizing that came out
of the civil rights movement, and I think also was translated into the
Black Power movement, this sense of organizing, this sense of
empowerment that people could be the architects for change. And this was
happening all over the country.

So, when you look at The Black Power Mixtape, you’re able to kind of
reflect on a moment and understand that there are core values at that
moment, you know. Yeah, I mean, it was James Brown who, at the same
time, came out and said, "I’m black and I’m proud," at the same time.
So, all these particular—this particular energy was happening. And
certainly, for them to be able to capture this, be able to—the Swedes be
able to capture it, and looking from the outside in, was a critical part
of this. They were able to see this from the outside, and asked
very—sometimes very innocent questions. That’s certainly that
interview—that response by Angela to violence was extraordinary.

AMY GOODMAN: Let’s go to that clip.

SWEDISH TV: Yeah, but the question is, how do you get there? Do you get
there by confrontation, violence?

ANGELA DAVIS: Oh, was that the question you were asking?

SWEDISH TV: Yeah.

ANGELA DAVIS: You ask me, you know, whether I approve of violence—I
mean, that just doesn’t make any sense at all—whether I approve of guns.
I grew up in Birmingham, Alabama. Some very, very good friends of mine
were killed by bombs, bombs that were planted by racists. I
remember—from the time I was very small, I remember the sounds of bombs
exploding across the street, our house shaking. I remember my father
having to have guns at his disposal at all times because of the fact
that, at any moment, someone—we might expect to be attacked. The man who
was at that time in complete control of the city government—his name was
Bull Connor—would often get on the radio and make statements like
"Niggers have moved into a white neighborhood; we better expect some
bloodshed tonight." And sure enough, there would be bloodshed.

After the four young girls who were—who lived very—one of them lived
next door to me. I was very good friends with the sister of another one.
My sister was very good friends with all three of them. My mother taught
one of them in her class. My mother—in fact, when the bombing occurred,
one of the mothers of one of the young girls called my mother and said,
"Can you take me down to the church to pick up Carole? You know, we
heard about the bombing, and I don’t have my car." And they went down,
and what did they find? They found limbs and heads strewn all over the
place. And then, after that, in my neighborhood, all the men organized
themselves into an armed patrol. They had to take their guns and patrol
our community every night, because they did not want that to happen
again. I mean, that’s why when someone asks me about violence, I just—I
just find it incredible, because what it means is that the person who’s
asking that question has absolutely no idea what black people have gone
through, what black people have experienced in this country, since the
time the first black person was kidnapped from the shores of Africa.

AMY GOODMAN: That’s Angela Davis back, oh, 40 years ago in tape that was
found in the basement of Swedish public television that has just been
made into a remarkable film called Black Power Mixtape. In fact, her
face, with her famous afro, is the poster of—

DANNY GLOVER: Poster for the film, yeah.

AMY GOODMAN:—Black Power Mixtape. Talk about this point that she has
raised, about how you raise the issue of violence, Danny Glover.

DANNY GLOVER: Well, it’s very interesting, because—let’s just go back
just to step back and think about all these young students—the Bob
Moseses, you know, the Fannie Lou Hamers, you know, the Diane Nashes and
Stokely Carmichaels and all these. All these people had gone through
extreme periods of violence in the South, from the integration of lunch
counters to the burning and bombing of buses in the Freedom Rides, and
even as they organized, had been beaten, jailed. I mean, it was not—it’s
not uncommon—and when we look at the murder of the three civil rights
workers, Schwerner, Goodman and Chaney—they’re all not uncommon to face
extraordinary, extreme terrorism and violence, and to be able to kind of
now, with that, as young people, assume another kind of position and
understand violence in a different kind of way and reflect on that
violence in a different kind of way.

AMY GOODMAN: It was terrorism.

DANNY GLOVER: It was terrorist. It was terrorism. I went and talked with
Bob Moses, and he said, "When you talk about terrorism, I experienced
that. About the people that I work with in the South, trying to register
them to vote, they experience terrorism on a daily basis, historic
terrorism." So, when we kind of—when we think about that violence, that
Angela so brilliantly points it out, you know, that those girls who died
in that church were friends of hers, friends of her sisters, lived next
door to her. Her mother was a teacher, one of their teachers and
everything else.

AMY GOODMAN: It is amazing to think Angela Davis, yes, friends of the
little girls in a Birmingham church.

DANNY GLOVER: Yeah.

AMY GOODMAN: Condoleezza Rice, Denise McNair, one of the four children,
she was friends.

DANNY GLOVER: Absolutely.

AMY GOODMAN: Condoleezza Rice and Angela Davis coming from that same
environment.

DANNY GLOVER: Yeah, same environment. Then there’s Connie Rice.

AMY GOODMAN: Yes.

DANNY GLOVER: Connie Rice in L.A. came from that same environment, one
of the great civil rights lawyers in the country, too. You know, so,
yeah, it’s—but that moment, though, how she characterizes violence and
understanding violence—and think about that violence now in relationship
to what has happened in Tucson. You know, even though we know that this
young man is just deranged in some way, there’s the side that drove him
to that act, with the kind of vitriol, the kind of nasty, just
villainous violence that is happening. The violence that happened even
during, you know, town hall meetings in—

AMY GOODMAN: New Hampshire.

DANNY GLOVER:—during the healthcare crisis, the healthcare debate and
everything, all this kind of violence. Then you take, again, that, the
war, the wars—King talks about that, how that violence—that violence
comes home. That violence comes home to haunt us.

AMY GOODMAN: Actor Danny Glover is the co-producer of the film that has
premiered here at the Sundance Film Festival called The Black Power
Mixtape. We’ll come back to our conversation with him. We also speak
with him about Haiti. Stay with us.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: We’re broadcasting from the Sundance Film Festival in Park
City, Utah, as we return to my interview with the actor, the activist,
co-producer of The Black Power Mixtape, Danny Glover.

AMY GOODMAN: So, here we are at Sundance Film Festival, which is a
celebration of independent films.

DANNY GLOVER: Yeah.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about the importance of independent films.

DANNY GLOVER: I mean, this is one of the great—for me, after all the
blockbusters and everything, this is really—this is one of the great
moments, I believe, in my career, to be able to kind of support the
independent film, independent thinking. And certainly, if you take the
whole genre of independent film—and I use the word "genre," but if you
take independent films, and they invariably have some influence on the
industry anyway. Independent film is where the real work that actors get
a chance to do, where documentary—and this is why Sundance is so
brilliant, about documentary films, you know, and documentaries and
everything. It’s so brilliant with this work about that, supporting the
idea of documentaries. And when it does that, documentaries are our
place and our way of establishing our relationship to what is happening
to us. You know, it’s only where—it’s only where there’s some sort of
context in which we can look at what is happening to us, have opinions
on it, disagree with it, discuss it and have a discourse about it, and
perhaps, whether the documentary is about climate, whether the
documentary is about healthcare, whatever they are, perhaps have some
chance of understanding what the core issues are.

AMY GOODMAN: Certainly, the film that you’ve co-produced, this film
Black Power Mixtape, is about movements 40 years ago. And the question
is—well, another of the people here, the big films here, is about Harry
Belafonte.

DANNY GLOVER: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: And he is here. And he is raising this question. He said
that he feels like he has failed now, as he looks back, whether there
will be a new generation of activists following what has been
accomplished over the decades, as he walked with King and his activism,
aside from his artistry and his music. How do you feel about that?

DANNY GLOVER: I don’t sense that we—of course, we have a 20-year span in
our age, and I don’t think—and there’s so much work still that has to be
done. But I have no sense of failure. I’m an eternal optimist, as well,
you know, and I believe that, as Paul Robeson said, each generation
makes its own history. They make their own history. And I think that
this generation, that now it’s going to make their history. They’re
going to have to respond to the crisis, whether it’s the climate crisis
or whether it’s the financial crisis, the crisis of poverty in the
world, the crisis of the inequity in the world. They’re going to have to
deal with that, you know? And they’re going to have to listen outside of
the framework and the constructs that they often have—have really
dictated their lives or structured their lives and everything. They’re
going to have to do that.

And understand that we can be here forcing that issue, talking about
that and talking about—the question is, is that, if we’re going to talk
about democracy, what is democracy? And as I said the other night, whose
democracy does it belong to? You know? And that’s the fundamental
question here. And once we begin to tackle that and struggle against
that, we have a chance, you know, because the powers, the powers that
be, are going to find every way to undermine it, to subvert it, to stop
our voices, to cut off our resources, and find out a way they can do
that. But the question is that we have to believe that we can do this
and continue to do this.

AMY GOODMAN: Before we end, I want to talk about one of the great crises
of today, and it’s Haiti, a country that is very close to your heart.
You’ve been making a movie about Haiti for a long time. You visited
President Aristide last February in South Africa, who was forced out. We
have seen the horrendous earthquake and the effects of that—over 300,000
people killed, a million displaced, now this cholera outbreak.

DANNY GLOVER: Yeah.

AMY GOODMAN: And now we see "Baby Doc" Duvalier, a man responsible for
the deaths of I don’t know how many thousands of people—

DANNY GLOVER: Of people, yeah, yeah.

AMY GOODMAN:—the dictator of Haiti who followed his father, "Papa Doc"
Duvalier, the dictator before him, returned—

DANNY GLOVER: Yeah, yeah.

AMY GOODMAN:—when Aristide has not been able to. What are your thoughts?

DANNY GLOVER: It certainly is painful. You know, I, like Frederick
Douglass, often refer to myself as a Haitian at heart. And it’s
unacceptable that President Aristide is not there with his people. It’s
unacceptable that the State Department can say to us that there’s
no—there is no history or there’s no future for President Aristide in—

AMY GOODMAN: Let’s be clear. P.J. Crowley, the State Department
spokesperson—

DANNY GLOVER: That’s right.

AMY GOODMAN:—sends out in a Twitter message—he tweets that Aristide is
the past; we have to look to the future in Haiti.

DANNY GLOVER: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: You were talking about "whose democracy."

DANNY GLOVER: Whose democracy? Whose democracy?

AMY GOODMAN: Maybe we can extend it to Haiti.

DANNY GLOVER: You know, this country, these people have been under siege
for more than 200 years. After the moment after its independence, it’s
been under siege. And let’s not lie about it. In every way, in every
administration from that time on, from Jefferson to Madison to Clinton
to Bush—all of them—every single one of them has done something to
undermine Haiti’s ability to stand on its own feet.

Haiti is—these people are so resilient. They are incredible. They’re
organizing now. They’re there organizing amidst this chaos. Amidst the
cholera, in the midst of—in the midst of the earthquake, in the midst of
the lack of functioning government, they are organizing. You know what
I’m saying, that every single president, every single administration has
been responsible for what’s happening, and every one of them. Yet we
don’t know that. We don’t know any of that. We don’t have any of that
information right now.

But right now, you’re going to tell me that he is the past, that he has
no place and no future in Haiti, is unacceptable. It’s unacceptable that
"Baby Doc" has returned to Haiti. That’s unacceptable. And we have to
say that’s unacceptable. It’s unacceptable to sanction these flawed
elections, as the United States continues to pressure various countries,
pressure to OAS and pressure everyone in order to accept these—it’s
unacceptable.

And we have to—we’re going to have to, wherever we find—they’re standing
up for themselves. When they knocked down the fences and refused to be
denied the right to vote during an election of Préval, they made a
statement. They want their country back. They want their sovereignty
back. They want their independence back. That’s what the Haitian people
want. And this is speaking from a Haitian at heart.

AMY GOODMAN: And what is it you think the U.S. finds so—why will the
U.S. not allow Aristide to return? Why was the U.S. involved in the coup
against him, 1991 to 1994?

DANNY GLOVER: And the other coup in 2004.

AMY GOODMAN: And the coup in 2004, where they sent him off to the
Central African Republic into exile with his wife, Mildred Aristide, and
then he ends up in exile in South Africa, continually saying he wants to
return. What is it the U.S. has against this democratically elected
leader of Haiti?

DANNY GLOVER: Well, I don’t know how—what respect the United States has
for democracy, anyway, and for people’s right for self-determination,
anyway. I don’t know really if they have that. I think it’s part of an
ideal, certainly. I mean, but it was part of an ideal—you know, we know
our own history. It’s part of ideal. The Bill of Rights came out of—not
from the fathers of the republic; it came from people demanding
something more than that piece of paper.

So, yeah, what it is is that they must at every point in time undermine
the possibilities of democracy in Haiti. And Aristide represents that.
And now, you can say whatever you want about Aristide, the fact that he
was elected—elected. But in every way, Haiti represents something to the
hemisphere. Haiti becoming a true democracy, a functioning democracy,
represents something beyond that. Every single country in that
hemisphere counts—connects its relationship, its independence, its own
sense of sovereignty, its own sense of nationhood, to Haiti.

AMY GOODMAN: I know you have to leave. We just have two minutes. But the
power of film is the power of storytelling.

DANNY GLOVER: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: You have been focused on Haiti, in terms of film, by
wanting to tell the story of Toussaint Louverture. And as we wrap up, I
was wondering if, in a nutshell, you could tell us that story and why it
has grabbed you for so many years as a story you want to pass on to
future generations.

DANNY GLOVER: Well, it’s my story. It’s a story—Frederick Douglass said
in 1893 at the Chicago Fair that we owe so much to Haiti. José Martí,
the great Cuban revolutionary, said we owe so much to Haiti. We owe so
much to Haiti, first of all. But it’s an extraordinary story and the
only story of its kind ever—ever—in the history of human—that we have
written in written human history, that these slaves revolted and
challenged the empire. At the outset of the translation, new
translation, new construct of capitalism and liberal democracies, here
is this country, this smaller country, these people, who at that
particular point stand up and say, "It applies to us." That’s what they
said. "It applies to us." They were defining democracy in a different
way than even the fathers of democracy in this country were, even the
fathers of the Rights of Man in France were. They were defining
democracy. That’s what makes it special. It challenges us. Struggle
never concedes upon demand—Frederick Douglass. And that struggle,
whatever it was—the demand for independence, demand for sovereignty—is
still within the Haitian people’s heart.

AMY GOODMAN: Danny Glover, actor and producer. He co-produced with
Joslyn Barnes Black Power Mixtape, directed by Göran Hugo Olsson.

--
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/1/24/the_black_power_mixtape_danny_glover
Via InstaFetch

Article "Sundance 2011: 'The Black Power Mixtape 1967-75' brings the past into today | 24 Frames | Los Angeles Times"

Sundance 2011: 'The Black Power Mixtape 1967-75' brings the past into
today | 24 Frames

Sweden might seem an unlikely place to uncover a treasure trove of
archival material about the American Black Power movement of the 1960s
and '70s, but journalists from that country actually compiled an
extensive library of film footage of African American activists from
that era. Director Goran Hugo Olsson's "Black Power Mixtape 1967-1975,"
which had its world premiere this week as part of the Sundance Film
Festival's World Cinema Documentary section, charts a movement from
inspiration and activism to disillusionment and inertia.

The footage includes clips of Stokely Carmichael's whirlwind speaking
tour of Europe; Carmichael playfully taking over for a reporter to
interview his own mother; the Black Panthers' headquarters in Oakland;
and a riveting, passionate interview with Angela Davis conducted while
she was in prison.

The challenge for the director was how to give some shape to footage
collected over a wide span of time from various news reports. "It's a
mixtape," Olsson said at a screening Tuesday, "but we tried to keep a
storyline."

In perhaps his boldest move, Olsson has his interview subjects
(including Davis, Harry Belafonte, Ahmir "Questlove" Thompson, Talib
Kweli and scholar Robin Kelley) talk over the vintage images -- musician
Erykah Badu at one point even breaks into song. After the screening,
Olsson said he was inspired by DVD commentary tracks.

The tactic brings the images from the past into the present, giving a
sense that they still hold the power to engage. The film is in some ways
a reminder of the importance of historical records and the vibrancy of
archival film, as no photograph or written article could quite convey
the real sense of time and place that these moving images do.

During an especially lively Q&A after the movie screened, Olsson was
peppered with questions about certain choices, such as why he did not
include any contemporary African American activists among his voices,
opting instead for entertainers and performers. Olsson said he sought to
include performers who would attract a younger audience and engage with
the footage emotionally. He also rather humbly admitted he did not know
any contemporary activists and might have included them if he did,
adding with just a hint of irony, "Yes, you are right and I feel
ashamed."

Olsson said his main impulse for making the film came after he saw a
piece of footage of Carmichael speaking about Martin Luther King Jr. and
the meaning of nonviolent resistance. He realized, he said, "this is not
archive footage; this is something really important to bring out." He
said he hoped the film would "bring these images from Sweden, from the
past" into the present.

-- Mark Olsen in Park City, Utah

Photo of Stokely Carmichael from "The Black Power Mixtape 1967-1975."
Credit: Sundance Film Festival

--
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2011/01/sundance-2011-the-black-power-mixtape-1967-75-brings-the-past-into-today.html
Via InstaFetch

Article "Variety Reviews - The Black Power Mixtape: 1967-1975 - Film Reviews - - Review by Andrew Barker"

Variety Reviews - The Black Power Mixtape: 1967-1975 - Film Reviews -

A Story, Louverture Films and Svenges Television production. Produced by
Annika Rogell. Executive producer, Tobias Janson. Co-producers, Joslyn
Barnes, Danny Glover. Directed, written by Goran Hugo Olsson.

With: Stokely Carmichael, Eldridge Cleaver, Bobby Seale, Angela Davis,
Huey P. Newton, Louis Farrakhan, Erykah Badu, John Forte, Abiodun
Oyewole, Melvin Van Peebles, Kathleen Cleaver, Harry Belafonte, Talib
Kweli, Robin Kelley.
"The Black Power Mixtape: 1967-1975" is appropriately titled: Like any
mixtape, it offers some truly transcendent moments alongside a
smattering of filler, and never quite assembles its pieces into a
cohesive whole. Featuring reels of long-lost documentary and news
footage of black activists lensed by Swedish journalists, the film could
be of great academic interest, though probably not much more.
Covering the period from the rise of the Black Power movement to the
beginning of the inner-city drug plague that tore it apart, the
filmmakers have excavated some remarkable moments from the archives. A
jailhouse interview with cause celebre Angela Davis displays the wrongly
accused professor's intense erudition even in the face of appalling
treatment; a black-and-white segment of famed activist Stokely
Carmichael interviewing his own mother is touching; and a sit-down chat
with Louis Farrakhan on the eve of his rise to power in the Nation of
Islam shows the leader's serpentine charm already eerily intact.

One of the more interesting factors here is that all the footage is
presented in a completely Swedish context, meaning that scenes of
poverty in Harlem are framed in much the same way that American TV news
would present starvation in Ethiopia. But this also means that certain
elements are lost in translation, or seemingly misunderstood. A long
segment regarding a TV Guide critique of Swedish television reps the
most confusing inclusion, though it does generate some laughs with its
earnest description of TV Guide as "the most popular magazine in
America" over B-roll of pedestrians reading the rag while walking
through Times Square.

Voiceover commentary is provided by a grab bag of figures past and
present, ranging from the eloquent (Davis again, Last Poets member
Abiodun Oyewole, Harry Belafonte) to the perplexing (Talib Kweli).
Original music from the Roots bandleader Ahmir "Questlove" Thompson and
Om' Mas Keith is groovy.

Camera (color/B&W, 16mm); editors, Hanna Lejonqvist, Goran Hugo Olssen;
music, Ahmir "Questlove" Thompson, Om' Mas Keith; art director, Stefania
Malmsten; sound, Anders Nystrom. Reviewed at Sundance Film Festival
(competing), Jan. 21, 2011. Running time: 97 MIN.

(English, Swedish dialogue)

Contact the variety newsroom at  news@variety.com

--
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117944444/
Via InstaFetch

Article "Oregon Daily Emerald - Commentary: Inviting Angela Davis to campus an abomination"

Commentary: Inviting Angela Davis to campus an abomination

Can it really be so, Angela Davis on University-funded invitation, came
to campus this past week, for pay to "preach" on rights abuses and moral
and ethical and civil compasses?

Is nobody troubled by this?

Her publicity states: "She worked with prisoners." Here's how:

Angela Davis supplied guns to friends in 1970 that took over the Marin
County, Calif., courtroom of almost retired 65-year-old Judge Harold
Haley, duct-taped a cut-down, sawed-off double-barrel shotgun to his
neck like a tie and terrorized him like that for several hours. When a
rescue was desperately attempted, they cut short his retirement plans
but ended his suffering by pulling the trigger and literally blowing his
head off with both barrels.

Today, Angela Davis is now an honored guest of the University of Oregon.

How about the "prisoner work" she did do prison time for — trying to
smuggle a handgun into Folsom Prison buried in her then beehive-styled
hairdo?

Is the rationalization/justification now that her actions were just a
social act and not really intended to put hostages like Judge Haley or
the Rocky Butte jailer shot in the head by such a smuggled-in gun at
risk?

Was she greeted by those self-claimed activists who will opine that
Angela Davis was only misunderstood and "necessarily aggressive" in her
"acting out"?

Is her topic going to be how the fog of faded memories and history,
however terrible but lost to time, is the ultimate Statute of
Limitations?

With this, the University program clearly has lost its moral compass.

This is not someone with any modicum of an excuse or justification, like
Patty Hearst (who robbed a bank after being kidnapped), or even Ron
Eachus, later Oregon PUC director who as president of the University of
Oregon student body reportedly used student funds to travel to Hanoi
during the Vietnam war copying Jane Fonda to show his "solidarity."
Instead, she is more like the guy who bombed the PLC who claimed to be
"protesting the military-industrial complex."

Angela Davis has no justification, any more than the Eugene woman who
sought "relief" just because she had successfully hid out in Oregon for
some 20 years after being part of an "anti-war" group that killed a bank
guard, similarly the killer college-bomber of Madison, Wisc., or the guy
who set off the bomb that blew up on the UO campus or, for that matter,
the Trobridges claiming "No one was supposed to get hurt" referring to
their bomb that both killed and maimed innocents at the bank in Woodburn
last spring.

She makes her living off of the tragedies she has been intimately
involved in, if not outright caused.

I for one have an indelible etch in my memory of the newspaper's
courtroom sketch of a sorrowful and soon-dead Judge Haley with the
Angela Davis-supplied shotgun permanently duct-taped around his neck.

Is there is any difference between the murder acquittal of Angela Davis
and that of O.J. Simpson?

Both involved the best criminal defense attorneys that money could buy,
clearly overpowering the local DAs; the only major difference being that
afterward Angela Davis in fact went to prison. Not for this specific act
but for, in her arrogance following her acquittal, actually attempting
to repeat the same murderous act by smuggling into Folsom Prison a
loaded pistol to facilitate an escape with deadly consequences, a
certainty had she not been caught.

What makes Angela Davis' struggles any more heroic, and her personal
message any more press-worthy than that of Kip Kinkel, Diane Downs or
the recent Woodburn bank bombers, all recently denied the same social
forgiveness that seems to have graced Angela Davis?

The decision-making that brought Angela Davis here, for her profit no
less, and those authorizing payment to Angela Davis so she continues to
profit from her crimes need to be held personally accountable.

opinion@dailyemerald.com

--
http://www.dailyemerald.com/opinion/commentary-inviting-angela-davis-to-campus-an-abomination-1.1913901
Via InstaFetch

Article "CIVIL RIGHTS Activist to speak as part of UO event | The educator and author will be featured at the University of Oregon=?UTF-8?B?4oCZcyBXb21lbiBv?=f Color Conference"

CIVIL RIGHTS Activist to speak as part of UO event

As the closing keynote speaker, educator and civil rights activist
Angela Davis will give tonight’s final words at the University of
Oregon’s Women’s Center’s eighth annual Women of Color Conference.

Organizers had been working for months to coordinate conference plans,
which originally didn’t include Davis. But two weeks ago they learned
that Davis already would be in Oregon giving a lecture at Willamette
University.

Erin McGladrey, the Women’s Center office coordinator, said organizers
quickly scrambled to see if they could persuade Davis to speak at the
University of Oregon conference, too.

“I was shocked when I realized that she would be coming to Eugene. It
was even more unreal that she would be coming in two weeks,” McGladrey
said.

A radical activist during the 1960s, Davis now works as an educator,
author and speaker to promote issues such as prisoner rights, feminism,
Marxism and social justice.

“I’ve taken sociology and ethnic studies classes where I have read her
work; she’s like a hero to me,” said Jessica Rojas, an office assistant
at the Women’s Center. “She’s given me the language to talk about how I
feel.”

Davis worked with prisoners in the California state prison system where
she developed her ideas about the prison-industrial complex, a belief
that the expansion of the U.S. inmate population is due to the political
influence of companies that supply services to government agencies.

“I am really happy (Davis) will be here because I am not sure we are
having all of the conversations we should be having around
incarceration,” McGladrey said. “She really reinvigorates the
conversation.”

In the late 1960s, Davis joined the Communist Party of the United States
and the Black Panthers. She herself was incarcerated for 18 months
before being found not guilty in the violent 1970 attempt at the Marin
County (Calif.) Courthouse to free prison inmate George Jackson that
left four people dead. Jackson was a political activist at California’s
Soledad Prison who was accused of killing a prison guard.

Davis ran for vice president on the Communist ticket twice in the 1980s
and was awarded the Lenin Peace Prize for her contributions to the civil
rights movement.

Conference coordinator Andrea Valderama said Davis’ message fits
perfectly with the theme of the event titled “Our New Year’s Resolution:
Ending Oppression Through Expression,” which focuses on the oppression
of marginalized populations.

“She has really been speaking out passionately on these issues for
years,” Valderama said. “It was pretty much a no-brainer.”

While the Women’s Center’s office manager Brandy Ota declined to reveal
Davis’ appearance fee, Valderama said her addition nearly doubled the
cost of the conference raising it to $18,000.

Davis will speak at the UO in Columbia 150. Doors open at 6 p.m., and
the event starts at 7 p.m. Entrance for nonconference attendees will be
$5 for students and $7 for general admission.

--
http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/news/cityregion/25802324-41/davis-conference-activist-women-prison.csp
Via InstaFetch

Article "North Coast Rep Presents ACID TEST, 2/28 2011/01/28"

North Coast Rep Presents ACID TEST, 2/28 2011/01/28

North Coast Repertory Theatre presents ACID TEST, based on the true
story of Ram Dass, spiritual seeker, as he explores his life from the
time of being Richard Alpert, a tenured Harvard psychology professor
from a wealthy Jewish family, to meeting Timothy Leary and embarking on
377 LSD trips. He shares his adventures of traveling to India to meet
his guru, Maharajji, to becoming an international lecturer on
'enlightenment' to his writing a book on conscious aging and having a
stroke that paralyzes his right side. With humor and humility he
illuminates his search for inner peace and lasting truth and sheds light
on a new understanding of aging and death. Join him as he journeys from
'be here now' to 'still here' to 'be love'.
Lynne Kaufman (Playwright) Lynne Kaufmanhas written twenty full-length
pays which have won numerous awards and been premiered at the Magic,
TheatreWorks, Actors Theatre of Louisville, Fountain Theatre, Florida
StudioTheatre, and the Abingdon Theatre. Prizes and awards include the
Will Glickman Award for Best New Play in San Francisco, Theatreworks
Award for Best New Play in California, NEA Fund for New American Plays,
Dramalog, Best plays by Women Playwrights and the Otis Guernsey New
Voices in Playwriting Award from The William Inge Theatre Festival. Her
plays have been published by Smith and Krauss, Dramatists Play Service
and Dramatic Publishing. She also has three published novels to her
credit. Lynne teaches writing at OLLI U.C. Berkeley and California
Institute of Integral Studies.
Simon Levy (Director) Simon Levyis an award-winning director and
playwright who is the Producing Director/Dramaturg with The Fountain
Theatre in Los Angeles. In 2010 he directed OPUS at the Fountain
(nominated for Best Production OVATION Awards 2010) and last year's
PHOTOGRAPH 51 (nominated Best Production OVATION Awards 2009). His
directing credits at the Fountain include: MASTER CLASS (winner of the
2004 Ovation Award for Best Production); DAISY IN THE DREAMTIME; GOING
TO ST. IVES, which went to the Edinburgh Fringe Festival; THE NIGHT OF
THE IGUANA; SUMMER & SMOKE (winner of the Ovation Award for Best
Production); THE LAST TYCOON, which he wrote and directed (5 Back Stage
West awards, including Best Adaptation and Direction); and ORPHEUS
DESCENDING, (6 Drama-Logue awards, including Best Production and
Direction), among many others. Prior to moving to L.A., he was Artistic
Director for the One Act Theatre Company in San Francisco, a resident
director at the Magic Theatre of San Francisco, and General Manager of
Beach Blanket Babylon. He is a member of the Dramatists Guild, the
Society of Directors and Choreographers, and Literary Managers and
Dramaturgs of the Americas.
Jonathan McMurtry (Baba Ram Dass) Jonathanhas a fifty year affiliation
at San Diego's Old Globe Theatre where he is an associate artist, with
over 200 productions as an actor to his credit. He also teaches
Shakespeare for The Old Globe MFA program. He has performed in all of
Shakespeare's 37 plays. He is honored with the 2008 Craig Noel Lifetime
Achievement in the Theatre award for his service in San Diego and
outlying communities. He has appeared at major regional theatres across
the U.S.A. and Canada. Films include, Beautiful Joe with Sharon Stone,
Best Laid Plans with Reese Witherspoon, Little Nikita with Sydney
Poitier and Point Blank with Lee Marvin (to name a few). TV credits
include, guest-starring roles on Cheers, Frazier, Almost Perfect and
most recently Eli Stone. William Inge plays include, BUS STOP, PICNIC,
and DARK AT THE TOP OF THE STAIRS. McMurtry is a proud graduate of
England's Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts. He lives in Vista, CA with his
wife, Terri and their daughter, Coral.

--
http://sandiego.broadwayworld.com/article/North_Coast_Rep_Presents_ACID_TEST_228_20110128
Via InstaFetch

Article "FayObserver.com - Vietnam War: A picture's worth a thousand words"

Vietnam War: A picture's worth a thousand words

By Michael Futch
Staff writer

Wanted: vintage war photographs from home and abroad, circa Vietnam era.

Cape Fear Studios has put out a call to Vietnam veterans and their
families for wartime photography. As envisioned, select pictures from
those submitted will be presented as a series of exhibits in conjunction
with the Heroes Homecoming celebration in November.

Fayetteville leaders are planning the Heroes Homecoming over the 10 days
leading up to Veterans Day. The celebration, which will include an
agenda of community observances, will honor the Vietnam War veterans.

Chris Kastner, executive director of Cape Fear Studios, said the
Vietnam-era photography will serve as a key component of the homecoming
festivities.

"I think it gives the vets a chance to tell their story," she said. "I
think visual images are so powerful. It makes it real to a lot of
people. You can read about a lot of things, but when you walk through
and see images, I think it has a much better impact."

Images are being accepted through the middle of August, Kastner said.
They can be submitted in any format, including photographs, slides and
film. The images will be returned to their owners.

"Obviously, we'd like to get the photos in this winter and spring," she
added. "We need to have time to do something on the images and have them
matted and framed."

Cape Fear Studios, a nonprofit arts organization in downtown
Fayetteville, is using a $4,000 grant from The Arts Council of
Fayetteville/Cumberland County for the project. The money will cover the
cost to print, mat and frame 90 images. If there's a need for additional
materials, the studio is eligible to apply for another grant July 1.

Plans call for a series of exhibits that could be displayed in the
Museum of the Cape Fear and the Fayetteville Area Transportation and
Local History Museum.

"We hope to have them in several other locations around town," she said.
"Depending on how much we get, we could hang some in the mayor's office
or other places."

The studio has already received pictures of an infantryman in Vietnam
and The Old Guard - the Army's official ceremonial unit and escort to
the president - at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Va.

At this time, Cape Fear Studios is interested in receiving scenes of
military units at home or in Vietnam, and images of military members and
the equipment they used. Images of Vietnam before the nation's
involvement in the conflict also are being sought.

Some images may be deemed too graphic and powerful for children, Kastner
said. Organizers may decide to separate those in a display for older
viewers.

Veterans groups are being notified. Though many soldiers who served in
Vietnam have died, Kastner said, some of their families may have
pictures from the period.

Telling the whole story

During the Vietnam era, anti-war protests were staged in Fayetteville
and other parts of the country. In May 1970, actress Jane Fonda was
among 2,000 anti-war protesters attending a rally in Rowan Park.

"We're going to tell the whole story," Kastner said. "I think that's the
plan for Heroes Homecoming in general. They're including the protest
side of things. I could see photography doing the same thing. At this
point, we're kind of reaching out in general."

For this effort, the studio is partnering with the Museum of the Cape
Fear, the art department at Fayetteville State University, and the
Fayetteville Area Transportation and Local History Museum.

Shane Booth, a photographer and art instructor at FSU, will work with
the images with his art students.

"We just need to be getting the word out," Kastner said. "Depending on
what we receive, we'd love to do a Vietnam then and now. Several
veterans have traveled back to Vietnam and have recent pictures."
Staff writer Michael Futch can be reached at futchm@fayobserver.com or
486-3529.

--
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/01/30/1062731?sac=Home%3E
Via InstaFetch

Article "Joseph Lowery: From King to Obama, A Witness to History"

From King to Obama, A Witness to History
Joseph Lowery: From King to Obama, A Witness to History
By Yonat Shimron
Jan 26, 2011
When the Rev. Joseph E. Lowery gave the inaugural benediction at Barack
Obama’s swearing-in ceremony, he saw himself performing a role in a
national drama that began 45 years earlier when he stood alongside
Martin Luther King Jr. at the Lincoln Memorial. Gazing out at the masses
assembled on the mall as he listened to King’s 1963 speech, Lowery says,
“I was participating in the nation’s response to that call.”

Now 89, the Methodist preacher and civil rights leader is capping a
career full of historic moments with a book of collected sermons and
speeches. Singing the Lord’s Song in a Strange Land (Abingdon Press;
reviewed in this issue) reflects Lowery’s unquenchable thirst for
justice as he calls the nation to fulfill God’s vision for society.

“I never could get away from the gospel being an instrument to help make
heaven our home but also to make our homes more heavenly,” he tells RBL
during a telephone interview from his home in Atlanta.

The book, which he assembled with his daughter Cheryl, contains
reflections not only on his early days with King, but also on what he
sees as present-day social ills such as the death penalty and the
growing divide between rich and poor. In trademark African-American
preacher style, he makes great use of parallels and rhymes, and in
trademark Lowery style, he employs humor.

The book’s title is a nod to Psalm 137, in which the ancient Israelites
asked how they could sing to God while weeping over their captivity in
Babylon. Unlike the ancient Israelites, says Lowery, black Americans
took it upon themselves to sing and entertain their oppressors while at
the same time challenging them with God’s message. “We used the
opportunity to preach the gospel and raise the religious and theological
questions of our condition.”

With the book’s release in February, Lowery says his most pressing goal
is to “make 90” on his next birthday, Oct. 6. If God grants him more
time, he wants to continue writing and help secure a firmer financial
footing for the Joseph E. Lowery Institute for Justice and Human Rights
at Clark Atlanta University, which trains young people in civil rights
action.

“The election of Barack Obama was a sign of a new beginning,” he says.
“But we’re witnessing a wave of resistance to what that election
represents. We’ve got to be aware of that and not be fooled but remain
true to our higher calling.”

Yonat Shimron lives in North Carolina and writes about religion.

Related Topics and Links:

Also on PW

Five Degrees Of Metadata: Small Changes Can Mean Big Sales
more...
First Fiction 2011
more...
Spring 2011 Adult Listings
more...

--
http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/book-news/religion/article/45911-joseph-lowery-from-king-to-obama-a-witness-to-history.html
Via InstaFetch

Article "Tet was turning point for many area vets » Region » Traverse City Record-Eagle"

Tet was turning point for many area vets » Region » Traverse City
Record-Eagle

TRAVERSE CITY — John LeBrun arrived in Vietnam on the first day of the
Tet Offensive — 43 years ago today.

On his second day, Jan. 31, 1968, he was sent to Hue, the ancient former
capital of Vietnam and the scene of intense hand-to-hand combat. He was
18.

The Tet Offensive, a surprise Viet Cong and North Vietnam attack against
100 South Vietnam cities and villages, is considered a major turning
point in the Vietnam War because it marked the beginning of a growing
American anti-war sentiment.

Lance Cpl. John LeBrun had a turning point of his own, though somewhat
different. It came on Hill 881 near Khe Sanh on April 22, 1968. Mortar
hit him in the face. He lost an eye and the top of his head. Three
pieces of shrapnel lodged in the left front lobe of his brain.

Doctors removed the shrapnel, removed the injured eye and put in an
artificial one. They closed his head injury with a platinum plate and
sent him back to the United States for more medical care and
rehabilitation.

"I was a mess; no hair, no eye," he said. "My whole face was torn up
with a scar ear-to-ear that follows the hairline. It looked like
stitches on a baseball. They basically had to take my face off and put
it back together."

He had to learn to walk again. Doctors told him he probably wouldn't
live past 40, that he likely would have epileptic seizures the rest of
his life and that his memory wouldn't return.

"Right then, I started doing multiplication tables in my head," he said.
"I was too bull-headed to accept that."

'Well enough to give'

LeBrun, a Bay City native who now lives near Interlochen, could be the
poster veteran for the Vietnam War. He enlisted to avoid the draft; he
was injured five times during his three and a half months of combat.

He recalls war protesters spitting on him and calling him "baby killer"
as he was rolled off a plane to be taken to a U.S. military hospital. He
tried for six years to work, but finally had to stop because of seizures
and severe migraines.

Today, he has a 90 percent disability rating and lives with his wife. He
volunteers once a week at the Veterans of Foreign Wars center on
Veterans Drive in Traverse City because he's "well enough to give back."

LeBrun avoids reflecting on the war today because his biggest fight in
his healing is to maintain a positive, can-do attitude.

"My self-preservation has been not to think about it," he said. "I've
tried to stay positive, off drugs and keep busy. I take every day as it
comes. I have good days, and I have bad days."

He thinks the Vietnam War was a turning point for the United States, one
that showed Americans the need to take better care of returning war
veterans. Vietnam soldiers often met blame, criticism and ridicule, and
got little treatment for post-traumatic stress and other war-related
ailments.

"People needed to learn to hate the war, but love the warrior," he said.
"Don't let happen to today's troops what happened to the Vietnam
soldiers."

Dreams denied

More than 58,267 of the 3.5 million soldiers who served in the Vietnam
War between 1964 and 1975 never made it back home.

"War is hell," said Bob Hanley, his voice cracking as he talked about
joining the Marines in 1963 at age 18 with Tom Yagle, a neighbor and
boyhood buddy.

Yagle is believed to be the first area soldier to die in Vietnam. He
died of multiple mortar wounds on April 16, 1966, near Da Nang. His name
is among the 42 names of fallen area Vietnam soldiers listed on the
Vietnam memorial stone at the new Grand Traverse Veterans Park along
11th Street.

John Burgess' name is there, too. A "hell-hole" is how he described
Vietnam in a letter to his sister, Peggy Waukazoo Hardley, of Traverse
City.

A 1967 Kingsley High School graduate and basketball standout, Burgess
joined the Army in 1968 to serve his country and get an education,
despite his adoptive mother's objections, Hardley said.

His dream was to go to college after the war and become a professional
basketball player. He became a helicopter crew chief in the 227th
Aviation Battalion. His college and basketball dream crashed and burned
near the Cambodia-South Vietnam border on June 30, 1970, after enemy
fire hit the UHIH helicopter with a five-man crew aboard. Only one
survived. Burgess' body was never recovered and is believed to have
burned in the crash.

His mother long held out hope that he was alive and only missing,
Hardley said. She had adopted him, a sister and a brother when they were
preschoolers.

Originally born Larry Waukazoo in a family of eight children, Burgess
was the great-great-grandson of Pen-dun-wan, Chief Peter Waukazoo, who
in the 1840s played a vital role in preserving the Grand Traverse Band
of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians to the present day, said family
genealogist Art Dembinski, of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio.

His great-grandfather, Joseph Waukazoo, served in the all-Indian Company
K of the 1st Michigan Sharpshooters in the Civil War, and his
grandfather, Ed Waukazoo, was a World War I veteran.

Connections through a Wall

The Vietnam War touched Traverse City and the nation in many ways. Its
wounds still ache in hearts of many Americans old enough to remember
combat, protest marches, and inadequate veterans services and benefits.

Families, friends and complete strangers leave flowers, notes and flags
along the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall in Washington, D.C. They look
up the names of parents, siblings, cousins and old classmates.

Peg Brace didn't know Jim Jaquish well when they graduated from Traverse
City High School in 1967 and attended some of the same classes at
Northwestern Michigan College the next year. But she made a point of
going to the Vietnam Wall to see his name in the early 1990s while on
vacation in Washington, D.C.

She wanted to honor the kind, quiet classmate from Traverse City High
School.

"I remember touching his name on the panel and realizing that I actually
knew someone whose name was on the wall. It was sad. He was so young
when he died and had a whole life ahead of him"

Jaquish was killed Sept. 23, 1969, in a mine explosion. He played
football in high school and received the Order of the Arrow, a Boy Scout
leadership honor. He also spent a year on the Traverse City Senior High
School student council, the Record-Eagle reported in a front-page story.

Melvin Wanageshik, an American Indian from Traverse City, was killed
Feb. 19, 1968, during the Tet Offensive. His cousin, Valerie Maidens,
tried to honor his memory by asking the Army to correct the misspelling
of his name as "Wangeshik" and inaccurate descriptions of him as
"Caucasian" and "Baptist."

He comes from a long line of Methodists.

Wanageshik served in Vietnam as a reconnaissance specialist with the
11th Armored Cavalry from March 8, 1967, until his death. He died of
"multiple fragmentation wounds," in Long An Province. Born in Elk
Rapids, he attended elementary and junior high schools in Traverse City,
and transferred to Kingsley in 1961 and graduated from Kingsley High
School.

He graduated as a diesel mechanic in June 1966 from a mechanic school in
Pontiac and enlisted in the Army in October that year.

Maidens never heard back from the Army. She knows the monuments might
never be changed, but she hopes clearing the paper record might correct
misinformation on the Internet.

"It just doesn't seem right," she said.

COMING MONDAY: Psychological wounds slow to heal.

--
http://record-eagle.com/local/x131146186/Tet-was-turning-point-for-many-area-vets
Via InstaFetch

Article "Legend in DC Gay Rights Movement Honored"

Legend in DC Gay Rights Movement Honored

WASHINGTON - The Facebook generation is helping an historical legend
from Washington DC who used a picket sign to start the gay rights
movement.

Doctor Frank Kameny who still lives in Northwest has helped push the
cause for more than a century. Now those who have benefited are helping
him in his senior years.

Frank Kameny long ago decided to give up a dream of being an astronaut
to be an activist.

Before there were pride parades or stonewall riots, there was a young
Frank Kameny. He changed the tone and may have changed a generation.

In the basement bar of the popular Florianas restaurant in Dupont
Circle, Kameny talks about a half century of pushing for gay rights.

At 85, Frank Kameny is considered the architect of the modern gay rights
movement and has lived to see much of his life's work realized.

I feel comfortable in the ensuing half century; I’ve helped make being
gay much better now than it was then. It's not perfect, we still have a
way to go," said Kameny.

At the bar with him on this day is a 34 year old man who is part of a
growing group in a younger generation who is starting a movement to
toast the Civil Rights pioneer.

LINKS:
Buy Frank a Drank Facebook Page
www.helpingourbrothersandsisters.com

"I owe him. The entire gay community owes him. For sixty years he's
fought to make my life better and to make life better for the people I
care about," says Ben Carver.

Kameny is a living legend wrapped in every color of the rainbow.

He's a decorated veteran who served in World War Two in the Battle of
the Bulge.

He was fired by the government in 1957 for being gay; Kameny then led
the first ever gay protests in front of the White House and the
Pentagon.

He also wrote and filed the first known brief for gay rights to the U.S.
Supreme court.

"It was filed almost to the day 50 years ago. It forced me to put my
thoughts in order. I must say after 50 years it reads pretty well. I
have a copy at home. I looked at it. It reads nicely," laughed Kameny.

He also laughs at the notion that he has become one of the gay
community's proudest monuments.

When a street was named after him in the nations capitol, "Kameny Way,”
he was still carrying one of his now historical picket signs.

His Northwest house is now a DC landmark.

Important letters to people like V.P. Hubert Humprey and others are now
part of a collection of 70 thousand documents and papers at the library
of congress as part of the historical record of the U.S.

The same picket signs used 50 years ago are now part of the
Smithsonian's American History Museum.

Looking at a collection of photographs, Frank Kameny talks about being
the first openly gay congressional candidate in 1971.

He is best known for coining the phase "Gay Is Good."

These days after more than a half century of work, Kameny is constantly
being honored.

With the repeal of 'Don't Ask Don't Tell and other LGBT victories; he's
been to the White House several times; where a pen is as powerful as a
picket sign.

More than 50 years after he was fired for being gay, Frank Kameny was
there as President Obama extended federal benefits to same sex couples.
Kameny got the first pen used in the signing and says he treasures it.

He notes that times have changed and he recently got an apology from his
old bosses.

"Here a half century after we picketed in front of a hostile White House
which wouldn't even answer our letters; here now along with many others,
I was an honored guess where the president himself addresses me as
Frank. It represented a change that would have been unthinkable when we
got started. I don't think any of us would ever have imagined that that
would have occurred like that in our times.

Because he's made life good for so many, some in the community believe
its time to return the favor.

"We owe Frank. He in many ways has been the backbone of our community he
has done so much for us to get to the point where we can pay back the
favor," said Carver.

To do that, Kameny now has a Facebook page dedicated to him.

He jokes it a new tool for a new generation.

"Obviously you can't live without having heard of Facebook and Twitter.
I'm not sure how either one of them operate exactly. I keep hearing of
these things. I don't know anything about them," said Kameny laughing.

The page is called 'Buy Frank a Drink.' It was started by 34 year old
Ben Carver, a recent hate crime victim, who painfully knows there's more
work to be done.

First up; lending a helping hand to the person who laid the ground work.

"For 10 dollars, the price of a nice cocktail, you can toast a gay
rights legend and help him with basic living needs like food and
electricity and other utilities," said Carver.

"Im most grateful that, I’ve heard about," says Frank about the Facebook
page.

"If i get enough figurative drinks, I’ll be absolutely delighted. I'm
deeply grateful to him. More than i can express."

The group Helping our Brothers and Sisters first noticed Frank Kameny
needed help during last year's snow storm when he had

--
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/legend-in-dc-gay-rights-movement-honored-012711
Via InstaFetch

Article "How undercover officers squandered millions of pounds, with flash cars, luxury flats and up to 14 hours' overtime a day | Mail Online"

How undercover officers squandered millions of pounds, with flash cars,
luxury flats and up to 14 hours' overtime a day

By Caroline Graham
Last updated at 2:18 AM on 23rd January 2011

His revelations in last week’s MoS dominated news bulletins. Now the
police spy who posed as an eco-warrior reveals how colleagues enjoyed
flash cars, luxury flats - and up to 14 hours’ overtime a day...

Police spy Mark Kennedy told last night how his bosses squandered
millions on ‘unnecessary luxuries’ while infiltrating green campaigners.

The 41-year-old undercover officer, who posed as an eco-warrior for
eight years, said his handlers drove top-of-the-range BMWs and Audis,
rented luxury apartments and claimed huge sums in overtime.

In a series of extraordinary interviews from a safe house in America
where he has been in hiding, Kennedy – who became long-haired hippy Mark
Stone to infiltrate activist groups in Britain and Europe – lifted the
lid on what he calls the ‘shocking mismanagement’ of undercover officers
and the squandering of millions of pounds worth of taxpayers’ money.

Still in hiding: Mark Kennedy in America. He has revealed how millions
of pounds was squandered by police infiltrating eco-activists

He revealed how:

- Superior offices blew their budget on expensive Volvo XC90 4x4
vehicles that were ‘highly impractical’ but ‘looked flash’.
- The National Public Order Intelligence Unit (NPOIU) that he worked for
rented luxury London apartments for staff, complete with concierges,
gyms in the base-ment and spectacular views.
- He earned massive overtime payments every day for the whole eight
years he was undercover. Kennedy says: ‘I was taking home more money
than an inspector who was two ranks higher than me.’
Kennedy took part in protests throughout Britain and Europe, including
invading power stations and infiltrating animal rights protests. He even
took part in G8 riots in Germany. He was ‘outed’ among campaigners as a
spy after falling in love with a red-haired activist who discovered his
real name in his passport.

In last week’s Mail on Sunday, he told the remarkable story of his time
undercover – and revealed that he was now in fear of his life after
receiving death threats from activists. His undercover role was thrust
into the limelight after the trial of six activists allegedly involved
in a planned attack on Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station collapsed amid
reports that Kennedy had offered to aid the defence.

Mark Kennedy as a fresh-faced Pc for the City of London Police in 1990

Since his activities were exposed, serious questions have been raised
about police covert operations against environmental groups – and the
cost of them. Kennedy, who left the police after being taken off his
undercover role, revealed: ‘Each undercover officer cost £250,000 a year
in wages, overtime, cost of transport and housing. Every day I was on
the job, even if I was at 'home' in bed watching telly and doing the
laundry, I got five hours’ overtime. My handler got the same overtime.

‘When I was actively involved in operations I would get the maximum,
which was 14 hours of overtime on top of my eight-hour working day.

‘They paid me for 22 hours of work which was the maximum I could claim
in a 24-hour period. This could go on for weeks. My handler, or cover
officer, would get the same.

'He would be at home or at a hotel near me if I was abroad. But, to be
honest, I really earned it. I was living undercover for eight years. I
slept in doss houses. I put myself in danger. I lived a lie.’

However, Kennedy added that he was ‘appalled’ by how much taxpayers’
money was ‘squandered’ on unnecessary luxuries for operatives. ‘Handlers
were given Volvo XC90s from about 2006 onwards. It was a stupid car to
have. When I had to meet my cover officer I felt the car was a liability
because if I’d been seen getting into it my activist “friends” would
have asked questions about who I was seeing.

‘They had seven of these cars. If we all had a meeting it looked like
the CIA had turned up or something – seven identical flash cars in the
car park of a pub.

‘Towards the end of 2009 the handlers were told they could choose their
own new cars and were buying Five Series BMWs and top-of-the-range
Audis.’

He told how police spies would be appointed from all over Britain and
the NPOIU would provide accommodation for them.

‘They would rent expensive apartments for them in Central London. Around
2002, I went to an apartment near Tobacco Dock [an expensive area of
London’s Docklands] which cost a fortune.

‘It was for two officers attached to the unit. They were laughing about
the luxury flat and how they had a view of Tower Bridge. They had a
couple of apartments near Vauxhall Bridge Road near Pimlico.

‘I have no idea how much they cost. It was a building with a concierge
and gym in the basement.’

Kennedy remains furious about the way he was ‘appallingly managed’ while
undercover.

‘I would embark on a course of action and a cover story but what
happened time and again is that I would get right up to the brink of
either joining an illegal action or meeting some dangerous people and
then would be told, “Hold on, we’re not sure you have the authority for
this.” It was about saving their own skin so that if something went
wrong they wouldn’t get blamed.’

He said the delays put him at constant risk of being exposed.

With tattoos, a pony tail and trendy shades, Mark Kennedy was just one
police officer to infiltrate activist groups, but says the officers were
'shockingly mismanaged'

On another occasion, a vital campaigners’ instruction manual that
Kennedy had obtained from someone at ‘the radical end of activism’ was
shredded by mistake.

He said: ‘I went to Berlin in 2007 to meet some fairly serious people.
They had been involved in some very dodgy stuff including trying to
prevent a train carrying nuclear waste from reaching its destination. I
had a meeting with one person who gave me a booklet. It was a highly
prized asset. This booklet was a “how to” manual on building incendiary
devices and derailing trains. It was definitely at the radical end of
activism.

‘I was told this was one of only a handful of copies in existence. The
person I met was connected with ex-members of the Red Army faction [more
commonly known as the Baader Meinhoff Group].

‘I took it home to the UK and immediately gave it to my cover officer so
it could be studied and copied. I told him I had to have it back within
a few days. When I asked for it back a couple of days later there was a
silence. He coughed and said, “I’m sorry it has been mistakenly
shredded. It was left on a desk and a girl from the admin staff shredded
it.”

‘I had to tell the activist that I had been stopped at customs and that
they had found it and confiscated it, which seriously crashed my
credibility and damaged all the hard work I’d done to infiltrate that
particular group.’

Kennedy recalled how, while he lived in squats and ate food reclaimed
from bins, his superiors enjoyed living it up. ‘There was one time when
several of us from the NPOIU went for dinner. It was to this fancy
Conran seafood restaurant near Tower Bridge. It was massively expensive.

‘I sat there thinking this is the life. The bill came to hundreds of
pounds but then I had to go back to Nottingham to my activist “friends”
and my vegan lifestyle.’

Kennedy, who has cut his hair and covers tattoos with long-sleeved
shirts, is clearly struggling to return to ‘normal’ life.

He still lives in only the clothes he can carry in a small rucksack and
when I offer to buy him a new T-shirt he chooses the most inexpensive,
saying: ‘I can’t just turn capitalist overnight.’

As he prepares to return to Britain he admits he is frightened about
what will happen to him next but says: ‘I am glad this has blown apart
the world of undercover policing because it must change. I am coming
home to face the music.’

Last night, in a statement, the NPOIU said: ‘There are several inquiries
into all aspects of covert policing and as a result we feel it would be
inappropriate to comment on these allegations.’

I made secret recordings with a £7,000 Casio watch

Mark Kennedy was given a £7,000 specially-modified Casio G-Shock watch,
like this one, to make secret recordings

Kennedy used a specially modified Casio G Shock watch worth £7,000 and
equipped with a microchip to record a meeting of activists prior to the
planned raid on the Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station in 2009.

Kennedy said the meeting was recorded on a chip in the watch then the
information was downloaded to a police computer. The tape was
transcribed and Kennedy went through each line to note which activist
was talking.

The court case concerning the raid was thrown out because taped evidence
that would have cleared six activists due to stand trial was allegedly
withheld by police.

Kennedy said: ‘I don’t know where those transcripts ended up. I did my
bit. I sat in on the meeting and recorded it.’

Scared by a sinister email from old boss

Mark Kennedy last night told how he feels ‘frightened and scared’ after
receiving an ‘intimidating’ email from his former boss.

The email came from a detective chief inspector – whose name is known to
The Mail on Sunday but who has not been identified after a request from
police – at the shadowy National Public Order Intelligence Unit (NPOIU).
In it, the DCI says he is prepared to approach Kennedy’s elderly parents
in order to reach him.

Speaking from the safe house in America where he has been in hiding,
Kennedy told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I found the email sinister and
intimidating and the part of it where he said he would contact my
parents left me frightened and scared.

‘This is the most recent email from him but I had several earlier ones
saying he wanted to meet with me. Those emails started at the beginning
of this year. The DCI kept saying he wanted to meet with me for “risk
assessment” purposes but when I asked him for an agenda of the points he
wished to discuss he avoided answering.’

In the email sent last Wednesday, the DCI wrote: ‘If we have no response
from you we are considering contacting your parents to request that they
forward a letter on to you but we do not wish to cause them any worry or
distress.’

Kennedy said: ‘Why would he even say anything about contacting my
elderly parents when I did an interview with The Mail on Sunday last
week when he could easily have called the newspaper and got a message
through to me?

‘I also have Max Clifford fielding all sorts of book, film and media
offers so the police could contact me through him. It is very worrying
to me – particularly when there have been so many threatening messages
posted about me on the internet – that the police would threaten to turn
up on my parents’ doorstep when my mum and dad are already worried about
me.

‘I have nothing to hide. But what is it that the police want to say to
me that they cannot put in an email or tell The Mail on Sunday? It makes
me very suspicious.’

Kennedy showed The Mail on Sunday another email sent last Saturday in
which the DCI said he and another officer, Detective Chief
Superintendent Adrian Tudway, had arrived in Cleveland, Ohio, to meet
him in person.

Kennedy said: ‘I had told them I was planning to go to Cleveland to
visit my brother but they never went to my brother’s house.

‘I didn’t get the email in time because it went to an account I am no
longer checking regularly. But I would not wish to meet with anyone from
the police unless they can give me a specific list of questions they
want me to answer. I don’t trust the people I used to work for any
more.’

In his email, the DCI says: ‘Let me get on the record and say what the
purpose of the meeting is:

- ‘To gather information from you in order to enable;
- ‘An assessment of risk for your personal safety;
- ‘An assessment of risk for your immediate and extended family;
- ‘To assist in the assessment of risk to other Law Enforcement assets.’
Kennedy said: ‘I asked him to be more specific on several occasions but
he would not be specific. He just kept sending me those same three
points back. That makes me suspicious. I am shocked that two police
officers flew to America because of me. I would like to know why. I find
it foreboding and sinister that they won’t say why they need to see me
in person.

‘If they want to have an honest and open conversation about what is
going on then why can’t we speak on the phone?

‘If he’s worried about my safety and that of my family why can’t he talk
about that on the phone?

‘If he wants to discuss other assets then I’d be prepared to discuss
them too. I am now highly suspicious of anything the NPOIU does. I don’t
trust them at all.”

An NPOIU source confirmed that two members of staff travelled to the US
to discuss ‘risk assessment’ matters with Kennedy but were unable to
make contact with him.

Squats gave me lice but I couldn’t see GP

Kennedy told how he was unable to get treatment for the lice he picked
up in squats in Nottingham because as undercover operative Mark Stone he
did not have an NHS number.

‘I never had a doctor,’ he said. ‘I got head lice twice from sleeping in
squats. I felt totally and utterly disgusted. I was mortified. I
couldn’t go to a doctor and I couldn’t use chemicals to get rid of them
because of the life I was leading.

‘I was in a house with loads of people and any kind of chemicals were
banned. I had to put coconut wax in my hair and keep combing the lice
out. It took days to get rid of them.

‘Most of the camps I went to had poor toilet conditions, basically a
hole in the ground. There were instances of extreme stomach upsets and
dysentery.’

Kennedy would often drive other activists around in his police-funded
van as he was not insured to drive other vehicles.

He said: ‘I was always an extremely careful driver but I was constantly
frightened of crashing on the way back from an action. I would ask my
cover officer, “What happens in the event of an accident?” He would tell
me, “Don’t worry. We’ll deal with it if it happens.”

‘There was never any plan. If I questioned anything or tried to
anticipate something going wrong I would just be told, “Don’t worry.
We’ll deal with it.” I never felt secure.’

Kennedy revealed how he blew £5,000 of taxpayers’ money repairing his
Nissan Navara pick-up truck.

He said: ‘The NPOIU bought this truck for about 7,500 quid. Two
activists wanted to borrow my truck to go from Nottingham to Leeds. They
didn’t check the oil and on the way up the engine seized up.

‘I couldn’t just go out and buy another van because I was supposed to be
a money-challenged activist. So I had to take it and get a refurbished
engine put in.

‘I told the activists my mum had lent me money. It cost five thousand
quid to fix. Of course, my handlers wrote a cheque.’

--
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349647/How-undercover-officers-squandered-millions-pounds-flash-cars-luxury-flats-14-hours-overtime-day.html?ito=feeds-newsxml%3E
Via InstaFetch